|
It's great to see another major book by professor and two-time
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Anthony Lewis (born in 1927),
who specializes in telling the history of civil liberties
struggles in the United States.
Lewis's newest book is
Freedom for the Thought That We Hate
, subtitled
A Biography of the First Amendment
(Published January 2008 by Basic Books, Hardcover, 221 pages)
The book traces the development the modern
idea of freedom of expression. The concept was not always held to
mean what we today think it means.
In 1791 the following words were added to the Constitution of the
United States: "Amendment I.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances." But it wasn't until
1919 that the
Supreme Court actually began to apply that statement to mean that
citizens cannot be sent to prison for criticizing
government policy. Until then, the U.S.. had quite a history of
political censorship. Most Americans today are surprised when
they learn that the Wilson administration sent thousands of
people to prison, for terms typically ten to fifteen years in
duration, for speaking or writing that they disagreed with U.S.
entry into World War I.
The author's previous books also remain very important.
Over forty years ago Lewis wrote the book
Gideon's Trumpet
(Paperback, Vintage Books, 228 pages)
, which is still in print, with over a million copies sold.
It is the complete story of the Supreme Court decision of
1963 that established the right of a defendant to
a court-appointed lawyer. The case was based on an appeal by
prison inmate Clarence Earl Gideon, who was convicted in Florida
of theft without having legal representation.
Many readers say that their favorite work by Anthony Lewis is
his 1992
Make No Law
, subtitled
The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment
(Paperback, Vintage Books, 368 pages)
. In 1960 the New York Times ran an informative and
fundraising advertisment that was paid for by a black civil rights
organization. The ad criticized southern government officials
generally but it didn't name anyone in particular. Montgomery,
Alabama police commissioner L. B. Sullivan interpreted the
criticism as a reference to himself and he sued the newspaper for
libel. An Alabama state court ordered the Times to pay
Sullivan $500,000 in damages. In 1964 the Supreme Court of the
United States (New York Times Company v. Sullivan)
overturned the Alabama court by interpreting the First Amendment
to imply that it is not libel to criticize the conduct of
government officials. The court also clarified that the federal
constitution's First Amendment does restrict state governments.
Lewis's newest book,
Freedom for the Thought That We Hate
, takes as its title a phrase that was used in a dissenting
opinion by Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1929.
The book is largely about the tension that pulls
both ways. Some people get irritated by the fact that other
people can get away with saying the most horrible things without
bearing any consequences for it, and, at the same time, we know
that this is exactly the type of legal system we want to live
under. Indicative of the difficulty in discerning where to draw
the line, we often find people debating the proper meaning of
freedom of expression in the terms: I'm an absolutist; I'm not an
absolutist; you're an absolutist; you're not an absolutist.
Lewis says it is fortunate that those, in the U.S.
at least, who would like to see "hate speech" forbidden
by law, have been generally unsuccessful.
As a reader of the history, you may ask yourself
whether you are an absolutist. What comes into to your mind when
you read that, in 1931, the Supreme Court overturned a law that
had made it illegal to wave a red flag?
Lewis tells the story of a Christian clergyman who,
during World War I, under the 1917 Espionage Act, was sentenced to
fifteen years in prison for commenting from the pulpit that the
Bible requires pacifism.
The modern legal meaning of freedom of expression
was produced largely by a small number of Supreme Court justices,
including Louis Brandeis, who liked to say that sunshine is the
best disinfectant.
Since it is true in practice that "the
Constitution is what the judges say it is" (in the words of a
1907 comment by Charles Evans Hughes, Sr., who was to become a
Supreme Court Justice in 1910 and Chief Justice in 1930), a lot
has depended on the willingness of a few federal judges to take it
upon themselves to overthrow precedent. Some will derisively call
it judicial activism; nevertheless, before such activism the
people were subjected to such legislation as the Sedition Act of
1798, which provided for the imprisonment of anyone who spoke
against a President of the United States.
More:
Read the book description from the publisher's press release
Check the book price and shipping information
Book comments continued on
PAGE 2
|